1mind
A named AI with a face and a voice that qualifies, demos and rides along on your Zoom calls — with the best outcome evidence in this category and almost no engineering surface: no public docs, no SDK, no MCP, no published price, and a six-figure annual floor.
PRICING
| Quote only | Undisclosed, six figures/yr typical | No published tiers, no free trial, no self-serve entry. Annual commitment. CEO-stated average contract is six figures, with at least one customer cited at $400K/yr. Scope is per Superhuman per use case — Website Inbound, Ride-Along, In-Product Guide and Customer Success are separate deployments on one shared Brain, and most customers add a second Superhuman after the first |
| Implementation | Included in contract, time cost not price cost | Vendor-led onboarding stated at four to six weeks on 1mind's own recorded demo: training the Brain on your content, setting up integrations and guardrails, testing behaviour, then a supervised go-live with review and tuning. Independent reviewers put real-world go-live at one to two months, with some citing three to six for complex enterprise scope |
There is no pricing page to check, which is itself a finding: at this price point a buyer cannot self-qualify and must enter a sales process to learn whether the product is affordable. The six-figure figure is well-sourced — it comes from the CEO on the record in two separate interviews — but the entry point is not, and the competitor-published $50K–$100K range should be treated as an estimate by parties with an interest in the number. What is verifiable is the shape: annual commitment, vendor-managed implementation measured in weeks, and per-use-case scope that grows as you add Superhumans. Model this as a headcount-replacement business case, not a software line item, because that is how it is sold.
checked 2026-08-22 · vendor pricing page
Element scores
Strengths
1mind is doing something almost nobody else ships: a named AI participant with a face and a voice that holds a synchronous conversation, runs a live product demo inside it, and joins your Zoom calls as a headless solutions engineer on the rep's request. That is a harder engineering problem than text chat and the outcome evidence suggests it works. HubSpot — a company that could build this in-house and had every reason to — ran a 30-day statistically significant sitewide experiment against its own funnel and reported a 153% lift in Starter purchases and a 103% conversion lift from interactive demos, then expanded across multiple teams. Tealium reports $2.19M influenced pipeline. Pipedrive reports 2.2x conversion to paid. Named customers publishing their own numbers is rare in this category and it deserves credit. The context architecture is the quiet strength: one Brain across website, live call, in-product onboarding and customer success means the ride-along already knows what the buyer asked on the pricing page, and customers expand across use cases without re-implementing. The governance position is also better than most: ISO 42001 alongside SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 means an audited AI management system, customer data is stated never to train models, and the Superhuman is presented as a visible named AI rather than passing as human — which for a European buyer is the right side of Article 50 by design rather than by accident. The Clari and Salesloft partnership naming 1mind the exclusive AI successor to Drift, announced 6 March 2026, is real institutional validation and a genuine distribution channel.
Honest dings
There is almost nothing here for an engineer to read. No developer documentation, no SDK, no API reference, no changelog, no schema — an open API is mentioned once in a website FAQ and nowhere else. No MCP, no A2A, no protocol support at all, which in August 2026 means every connection is a bespoke 1mind integration your other agents cannot reach. No published pricing, so you cannot self-qualify before entering a sales process on a six-figure annual commitment. No customer-run evaluation surface: behaviour is tested by the vendor before go-live and tuned after, but you cannot fire a regression suite before a content update, and no accuracy or hallucination rate is published for an agent making live pricing and technical claims to your buyers. No interpretability surface either — when the Superhuman gets a technical answer wrong in front of a prospect, there is no documented mechanism for asking why. Add the structural risks. The vendor is young: founded 2024, 45+ customers, roughly 72 employees, $40M raised — this is a Series A company you are wiring into the front door of your revenue motion on an annual contract. Integration depth is concentrated around Salesforce, HubSpot, Marketo, Salesloft, Gong and Gainsight, and independent reviewers note the story is tied closely to the Clari and Salesloft ecosystem, which is a strength if you live there and a constraint if you do not. Implementation is four to six weeks by the vendor's own account and longer by others', which means the payback clock starts a quarter after you sign. And note what the numbers are and are not: the case-study figures are published by 1mind about named customers, and the ARR and retention figures circulating come from a founder interview, not from audited disclosure.
Sources (12) — every claim traceable
Every audit lists the research it rests on — transparency and traceability are the product. Tools evolve: each audit is a snapshot of its audit date, and re-audits supersede older versions (kept below for reference).
- 1mind.com/use-cases — Official product and compliance page verified 22/08/2026. Primary source for the four use cases running on one Brain (Website Inbound, Ride-Along, In-Product Guide, Customer Success), the integration list (Salesforce, HubSpot, Marketo, Salesloft, Gong, Gainsight, Freshworks supported, open API for additional systems), and the compliance claim: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR and CCPA, with customer data stated never to be used to train AI models (accessed 2026-08-22)
- 1mind.com/use-cases/website-inbound — Official capability page and the source of the customer outcome figures used in the Agents score: HubSpot's 30-day statistically significant sitewide experiment reporting +153% Starter purchases, +103% conversion lift from interactive demos and 33% engagement vs control; ZoomInfo 14x ROI; Tealium $2.19M influenced pipeline and ~$192K closed-won; Pipedrive 6x sign-up likelihood, 2.2x conversion to paid, +30% MRR, +28% deal size. Also documents CRM support for Salesforce, HubSpot, Dynamics and Pipedrive and structured qualification written back after every conversation (accessed 2026-08-22)
- 1mind.com/use-cases/ride-along — Official documentation of the live-call product: joins Zoom calls headless in the background, answers deep technical questions and runs demos on the rep's request, carries context from the buyer's earlier website conversations into the call, writes back to connected systems, with named expansions at Paligo, Phenom and Revlogic (three Superhumans on one Brain) (accessed 2026-08-22)
- 1mind.com/ethical-stance — Official Ethical Stance, last revised 12/08/2026 — evidence for the Guardrails and Interpretability scores. Commits to automated filters combined with human review against misuse, encryption in transit and at rest, no sale of personal data to third parties, monitoring of live deployments, published incident reports and third-party audits. Also the source of the registered address in Mill Valley, California (accessed 2026-08-22)
- techcrunch.com/2025/11/10/6sense-founder-amanda-kah… — Independent reporting (TechCrunch, 10/11/2025) and the primary pricing source: $30M Series A led by Battery Ventures bringing total funding to $40M, 30+ customers at the time including HubSpot, LinkedIn and New Relic, all on annual contracts rather than experimental budgets, average contract six figures. Also the source for the underlying model stack being OpenAI and Google Gemini combined with deterministic AI to reduce hallucination (accessed 2026-08-22)
- 1mind.com/announcements/1mind-is-the-exclusive-ai-s… — Official announcement of the Clari + Salesloft partnership naming 1mind the exclusive AI successor to Drift, with direct integration into the Clari + Salesloft Predictive Revenue System and signals flowing back into Salesloft Cadences and Clari forecasts (accessed 2026-08-22)
- resources.rework.com/news/sales-tech/drift-sunset-m… — Independent corroboration of the Drift sunset and its timing: Clari-Salesloft merger closed December 2025, 1mind partnership announced March 2026, Drift placed on a gradual sunset path with no published hard end-of-life date. Establishes that the 1mind referral channel is real rather than vendor framing (accessed 2026-08-22)
- theaiagentindex.com/agents/1mind — Independent review (published 20/05/2026, updated 15/07/2026, verified against live vendor data 09/07/2026): scores 3.6/5 overall with 2/5 on evidence and 1/5 on setup, confirms quote-only pricing at $100K+ annually, notes a public trust center and API but flags that there is no evidence of a standalone Salesforce connector independent of the Salesloft relationship, and confirms the Q3 2026 compliance position including AI-specific penetration testing (accessed 2026-08-22)
- docket.io/blog/1mind-alternatives-competitors — Independent competitor comparison used for the implementation and integration-depth caveats, with the vendor bias noted: places 1mind go-live at three to six months against competitors' one to two weeks, prices it at $50K–$100K+/yr, and characterises its integration depth as tied to the Salesloft ecosystem and its knowledge layer as implementation-dependent (accessed 2026-08-22)
- hardskill.exchange/the-gtm-superhuman-with-1mind — Transcript of a public 1mind demo (Hard Skill Exchange, 04/04/2026) with the CEO present. Source of the vendor's own onboarding estimate — most teams live in four to six weeks, with 1mind training the Brain, setting up integrations and guardrails, testing behaviour then tuning post-launch — plus the Experity head-to-head against Qualified (win rate 26% to 50%, sales cycle 28 days to 15) and the CEO's account of a large enterprise shortening its sales cycle by 23 days (accessed 2026-08-22)
- ai2roi.substack.com/p/ai-to-roi-case-study-1mind-su… — Independent case-study analysis describing the architecture in the terms 1mind uses internally: an AI Context Graph plus an Action Orchestration layer that ingests live content and customer data, manages memory across interactions, orchestrates tool calls in real time, and applies deterministic controls alongside generative dialogue. Also documents the human back-channel voice control that lets a rep invoke or silence the Superhuman mid-call (accessed 2026-08-22)
- getlatka.com/companies/1mind — Third-party profile built on a recorded founder interview (05/03/2026), used only for figures the founder stated directly and flagged as unaudited: ~$6M ARR, 211% net dollar retention, nearly every customer adding a second Superhuman within 90 days, per-engagement pricing of $100,000–$400,000 per year, and 72 employees (accessed 2026-08-22)