RXed AI News

AI to the bone.
Frontier platforms

ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini

ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini — editorial illustration

Which frontier platform should anchor your stack? Scores from the RXed AI Periodic Table v1.0 — identical 20-element scale, deterministic overall. How we audit →

At a glance

ChatGPT / OpenAI Platform
Scope18/20
Quality8/10
Claude / Anthropic
Scope19/20
Quality7/10
Gemini / Google
Scope19/20
Quality9/10

Scope = elements of the AI stack in the tool’s stated scope (dashed = honestly out of scope, never a penalty). Quality = how well it scores on what it covers. No single number — both axes, always.

The verdict

Gemini posts the best pair on the table (Scope 19/20 · Quality 9/10) because Google sells the whole stack — embeddings, vector store, RAG infrastructure and multimodal all score 9+ — if you can absorb Google Cloud complexity and constant product reshuffles. ChatGPT (Scope 18/20 · Quality 8/10) is still the deepest single-vendor default: strongest fine-tuning (Ft 9) and function calling (Fc 9), with model churn as the recurring tax. Claude (Scope 19/20 · Quality 7/10) wins the agent era on the narrow-but-decisive things: the best harness (Ag 9.5, Fw 9), context engineering (Cx 9.5) and MCP — but you bring your own embeddings (Em 3) and vector store (Vx 2). Building agents → Claude. Building on one vendor's full data stack → Gemini. Wanting everything adequate in one subscription → ChatGPT.

Where the quality sits

Reactive
ChatGPT / OpenAI Platform8
Claude / Anthropic9
Gemini / Google9
Retrieval & Memory
ChatGPT / OpenAI Platform8
Claude / Anthropic3
Gemini / Google8
Orchestration
ChatGPT / OpenAI Platform8
Claude / Anthropic9
Gemini / Google9
Validation
ChatGPT / OpenAI Platform6
Claude / Anthropic7
Gemini / Google9
Models
ChatGPT / OpenAI Platform9
Claude / Anthropic8
Gemini / Google9

Family mean over covered elements only — a dash means the family is honestly outside that tool’s scope.

ChatGPT / OpenAI Platform
Scope 18/20 · Quality 8/10
audited 2026-07-05
Claude / Anthropic
Scope 19/20 · Quality 7/10
audited 2026-07-07
Gemini / Google
Scope 19/20 · Quality 9/10
audited 2026-07-07
VendorOpenAIAnthropicGoogle (Alphabet)
OriginUSUSUS
PricingFree (with ads) · Go ~€8 · Plus ~€19 · Business ~€18–23/user · Pro ~€92–185 per month; API pay-per-tokenFree · Pro ~€19 ($20/mo; $17 annual) · Max ~€95/€190 ($100/$200) · Team ~€24/€120 per seat ($25/$125) · Enterprise custom, per month; API pay-per-tokenFree · AI Plus ~€5 ($4.99) · AI Pro ~€19 ($19.99) · AI Ultra ~€95/€190 ($99.99/$199.99) per month; API pay-per-token from $0.25/1M input tokens (3.1 Flash-Lite)
Pr Prompts899
Em Embeddings839
Cx Context9109
Tr Tracing789
Lg LLM999
Fc Function calling999
Vx Vector store729
Rg RAG879
Gr Guardrails789
Mm Multimodal9610
Ag Agents8109
Ft Fine-tuning939
Fw Frameworks & harnesses799
Ev Evaluations579
Sm Small models889
Ma Multi-agent789
Sy Synthetic data6
Pc Protocols799
In Interpretability5
Th Thinking models999

Hover any score for the written reason. Full detail: ChatGPT / OpenAI Platform passport → · Claude / Anthropic passport → · Gemini / Google passport →

Swap in a different tool — open the comparator →