RXed AI News

AI to the bone.
Latest auditsAI VersusMethodologyUpcoming & requests
Audited 2026-07-29 · RXed table v1.0

Harvey

Visit harvey.ai
“AI software for legal and professional services” — the vendor’s own words

Harvey won legal-AI distribution — 100,000+ lawyers, majority of the AmLaw 100 — but a rival's own published benchmark has it scoring below raw Claude on answer quality; you're paying ~€1,050+/seat/month for the workflow and security wrapper, not the smartest model in the room.

The verdict, read by Jan · AI clone of Jan’s voice, generated locally with his consent.
Best for: Mid-to-large law firms and corporate legal departments doing high-volume US federal/major-state document work, with the budget and governance discipline to fact-check every citation before it reaches a filing.
Scope18/20
Quality7/10
Where the quality sits
8Reactive
5Retrieval & Memory
8Orchestration
6Validation
6Models
Enterprise platformResearchAutomation & AgentsProductivityPaid
Vendor
Harvey (Counsel AI Corporation) · www.harvey.ai
Origin
US — San Francisco
Pricing
Small/specialized firm (25-50 attorneys) $1,500-2,000+/user/mo · Mid-market (50-200 attorneys) $1,200-1,500/user/mo · AmLaw 100 (200+ attorneys) $100-200/user/mo
Users (official only)
100,000+ lawyers across 1,300+ organizations in 60+ countries; majority of the AmLaw 100, 500+ in-house legal teams, 50 asset management firms. (source, 2026-03-25)

PRICING

Small/specialized firm (25-50 attorneys)$1,500-2,000+/user/mo$50K-100K/yr contract, 25-seat/1-year minimum (reported, not published)
Mid-market (50-200 attorneys)$1,200-1,500/user/mo$100K-250K/yr contract, 50-seat/1-year minimum (reported, not published)
AmLaw 100 (200+ attorneys)$100-200/user/mo$250K-1M+/yr, 100+ seats, multi-year typical (reported, not published)

Fully custom, sales-led, no public rate card, no self-serve, no free trial. Premium support runs ~18% of license value on top; custom model work billed separately.

checked 2026-07-29 · vendor pricing page

Element scores

Reactive
Retrieval & Memory
Orchestration
Validation
Models
Primitives
Compositions
Deployment
Emerging
Tap or hover any element to see why it got that score.

Strengths

Distribution is the moat: 100,000+ lawyers, majority of the AmLaw 100, 500+ in-house teams across 60 countries. Vault's bulk cross-document analysis (100,000 docs/project) is a genuinely differentiated M&A-diligence tool, security posture is enterprise-credible (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, first AI/LLM startup certified under the EU-US Data Privacy Framework, EU/Switzerland/Australia data residency), and Agent Builder lets non-engineers ship custom workflows.

Honest dings

No independent, methodology-public accuracy benchmark from Harvey itself — a competitor's own published 19-model comparison scored it below raw Claude on every legal task category, and independent testers keep finding hallucinated citations on niche jurisdictions and recent case law. Pricing is fully opaque with a ~€250K+/year floor and steep add-ons (training, premium support, optional fine-tuning that contradicts the "we never fine-tune on your data" security claim).

Prices and details change — this passport is re-verified at least quarterly.
Sources (12) — every claim traceable

Every audit lists the research it rests on — transparency and traceability are the product. Tools evolve: each audit is a snapshot of its audit date, and re-audits supersede older versions (kept below for reference).

RELATED ON RXED
LEARN Multi-agent (Ma) Several agents on one job — rarely worth the 15x token bill. NEWS Business implementation briefing — 2026-08-23 NEWS Legal cases briefing — 2026-08-20