Legora

“The collaborative AI powering lawyers to review and research faster, draft smarter, and advise with precision” — the vendor’s own words

Best-in-class tabular review and 12-jurisdiction research on an $866M war chest — but there is no eval surface, an independent rubric ranks it last of the big three, and the price only exists behind a sales call.

The verdict, read by Jan · AI clone of Jan’s voice, generated locally with his consent.

Best for: Mid-size firms (10–100 lawyers) doing high-volume, multilingual or cross-border document review — you get the best review surface in legal AI at a reported third of Harvey's price, if you accept a sales-led buy and verify output yourself.

Scope17/20

Quality6/10

Where the quality sits

8Reactive

5Retrieval & Memory

8Orchestration

6Validation

6Models

SpecialistResearchAutomation & AgentsProductivityPaid

Vendor

Legora (formerly Leya) · legora.com

Origin

US — New York

Pricing

Not published — sales-led. Third-party estimates ~€260–740/user/month (reported $300–800), ~10-seat minimum ≈ €26k+/year floor; Agent Pro moved to consumption-based pricing 06/2026

Users (official only)

100,000+ lawyers at 1,500+ law firms and in-house legal teams across 50+ markets (source, 2026-07-28)

Element scores

Reactive

Retrieval & Memory

Orchestration

Validation

Models

Primitives

Compositions

Deployment

Emerging

Tap or hover any element to see why it got that score.

Strengths

Tabular Review is the category-standout surface: a data room becomes a grid, each document a row, each prompt a column, so you verify 200 contracts side by side instead of interrogating a chat box. Legal Research covers 12 jurisdictions with source-level citations and the strongest multilingual range in the pair (native Arabic building with Al Tamimi since 06/2026). The Agent plans, executes, reviews and delivers end-to-end, and adoption is verifiable: GÖRG reports 96.81% weekly active usage across 380+ lawyers.

Honest dings

The only published independent rubric (HAQQ, disclosed vendor benchmark) ranks Legora last of the big three at 34.5/50 vs Harvey's 38.2, losing 9 of 11 categories. No customer-facing eval or regression-testing surface exists — on a tool selling trustworthy legal output, that is the biggest hole in the passport. Pricing is behind a sales call with a ~10-seat minimum, Law.com documents a growing build-your-own countercurrent ('wrappers' criticism), and reviewers note long documents past a few hundred pages grind in the grid.

Prices and details change — this passport is re-verified at least quarterly.

Sources (12) — every claim traceable

Every audit lists the research it rests on — transparency and traceability are the product. Tools evolve: each audit is a snapshot of its audit date, and re-audits supersede older versions (kept below for reference).

legora.com/product/aos — aOS architecture: agentic harness (tool routing, memory, model selection, guardrails), MCP connectors, parallel sub-agents (official) (accessed 2026-07-31)
legora.com/product/agent — Agent plan/execute/review/deliver loop, Skills, proactive monitoring; Wexler acquisition press mention (official) (accessed 2026-07-31)
legora.com/product/tabular-review — Tabular Review capability: documents as rows, prompts as columns, collaboration guardrails (official) (accessed 2026-07-31)
legora.com/newsroom/legora-enters-latin-america-wit… — Official user count: 100,000+ lawyers, 1,500+ organisations, 50+ markets (28/07/2026) (accessed 2026-07-31)
legora.com/blog/series-d — Official: $550M Series D @ $5.55B led by Accel (10/03/2026); 40→400 employees in a year; customers White & Case, Cleary Gottlieb, Goodwin (accessed 2026-07-31)
news.crunchbase.com/venture/ai-powered-legal-tech-s… — Independent: $50M Nvidia NVentures-led Series D extension (04/2026), $866M total raised since 2023 (accessed 2026-07-31)
tech.eu/2025/10/30/swedish-legaltech-legora-raises-… — Independent: Series C $150M @ $1.8B (10/2025); HQ now New York, offices Stockholm/London/Denver/Sydney (accessed 2026-07-31)
haqq.ai/blog/harvey-vs-legora-vs-cocounsel — Disclosed vendor benchmark (50-point rubric): Legora 34.5/50 average, last of the big three in 9 of 11 categories (06/2026) (accessed 2026-07-31)
law.com/international-edition/2026/07/22/who-is-not… — Independent: firms opting out — build-your-own countercurrent, 'wrapper' criticism, value-for-money and lock-in concerns (22/07/2026) (accessed 2026-07-31)
vaquill.ai/blog/harvey-vs-legora — Independent comparison: reported pricing $300–800/user/month, ~10-seat minimum, Agent Pro consumption pricing 06/2026, security certifications (accessed 2026-07-31)
toolpundit.com/harvey-vs-legora-which-is-better-leg… — Independent: ~$3,000/user/year estimate with 10-seat floor; G2 zero Legora reviews, FeaturedCustomers 4.8/5 from 747 vendor-curated ratings; grid slows past a few hundred pages (accessed 2026-07-31)
legora.com/newsroom/how-g%C3%B6rg-achieved-96-weekl… — Vendor case study: GÖRG 96.81% weekly active usage, 380+ lawyers, 35h in-person onboarding behind the number (accessed 2026-07-31)